Living with the Holocaust: The Journey of a Child of Holocaust Survivors
Sara Roy
Some months ago I was invited to reflect on my journey as a child of
Holocaust survivors. This journey continues and shall continue until the day
I die. Though I cannot possibly say everything, it seems especially poignant
that I should be addressing this topic at a time when the conflict between
Israelis and Palestinians is descending so tragically into a moral abyss and
when, for me at least, the very essence of Judaism, of what it means to be a
Jew, seems to be descending with it.
The Holocaust has been the defining feature of my life. It could not have
been otherwise. I lost over 100 members of my family and extended family in
the Nazi ghettos and death camps in Poland--grandparents, aunts, uncles,
cousins, a sibling not yet born--people about whom I have heard so much
throughout my life, people I never knew. They lived in Poland in Jewish
communities called shtetls.
In thinking about what I wanted to say about this journey, I tried to
remember my very first conscious encounter with the Holocaust. Although I
cannot be certain, I think it was the first time I noticed the number the
Nazis had imprinted on my father's arm. To his oppressors, my father,
Abraham, had no name, no history, and no identity other than that blue-inked
number, which I never wrote down. As a young child of four or five, I
remember asking my father why he had that number on his arm. He answered
that he had once painted it on but then found it would not wash off, so was
left with it.
My father was one of six children, and he was the only one in his family to
survive the Holocaust. I know very little about his family because he could
not speak about them without breaking down. I know little about my paternal
grandmother, after whom I am named, and even less about my father's sisters
and brother. I know only their names. It caused me such pain to see him
suffer with his memories that I stopped asking him to share them.
My father's name was recognized in Holocaust circles because he was one of
two known survivors of the death camp at Chelmno, in Poland, where 350,000
Jews were murdered, among them the majority of my family on my father's and
mother's sides. They were taken there and gassed to death in January
1942. Through my father's cousin I learned that there is now a plaque at the
entrance to what is left of the Chelmno death camp with my father's name on
it--something I hope one day to see. My father also survived the
concentration camps at Auschwitz and Buchenwald and because of it was called
to testify at the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem in 1961.
My mother, Taube, was one of nine children--seven girls and two boys. Her
father, Herschel, was a rabbi and shohet-a ritual slaughterer-and deeply
loved and respected by all who knew him. Herschel was a learned man who had
studied with some of the great rabbis of Poland. The stories both my mother
and aunt have told me also indicate that he was a feminist of sorts, getting
down on his hands and knees to help his wife or daughters scrub the floor,
treating the women in his life with the same respect and reverence he gave
the men. My grandmother, Miriam, whose name I also have, was a kind and
gentle soul but the disciplinarian of the family since Hershel could never
raise his voice to his children. My mother came from a deeply religious and
loving family. My aunts and uncles were as devoted to their parents and they
were to them. As a family they lived very modestly, but every Sabbath my
grandfather would bring home a poor or homeless person who was seated at the
head of the table to share the Sabbath meal.
My mother and her sister Frania were the only two in their family to survive
the war. Everyone else perished, except for one other sister, Shoshana, who
had emigrated to Palestine in 1936. My mother and Frania had managed to stay
together throughout the war--seven years in the Pabanice and Lodz
ghettos, followed by the Auschwitz and Halbstadt concentration camps. The
only time in seven years they were separated was at Auschwitz. They were in
a selection line, where Jews were lined up and their fate sealed by the Nazi
doctor Joseph Mengele, who alone would determine who would live and who
would die. When my aunt had approached him, Mengele sent her to the right,
to labor (a temporary reprieve). When my mother approached him, he sent her
to the left, to death, which meant she would be gassed. Miraculously, my
mother managed to sneak back into the selection line, and when she
approached Mengele again, he sent her to labor.
A defining moment in my life and journey as a child of Holocaust survivors
occurred even before I was born. It involved decisions taken by my mother
and her sister, two very remarkable women, that would change their lives and
mine.
After the war ended, my aunt Frania desperately wanted to go to Palestine to
join their sister, who had been there for ten years. The creation of a
Jewish state was imminent, and Frania felt it was the only safe place for
Jews after the Holocaust. My mother disagreed and adamantly refused to go.
She told me many times during my life that her decision not to live in
Israel was based on a belief, learned and reinforced by her experiences
during the war, that tolerance, compassion, and justice cannot be practiced
or extended when one lives only among one's own. "I could not live as a Jew
among Jews
alone," she said. "For me, it wasn't possible and it wasn't what I wanted. I
wanted to live as a Jew in a pluralist society, where my group remained
important to me but where others were important to me, too." Frania
emigrated to Israel and my parents went to America. It was extremely painful
for my mother to leave her sister, but she felt she had no alternative.
(They have remained very close and have seen each other often, both in this
country and in Israel.) I have always found my mother's choice and the
context from which it emanated remarkable.
I grew up in a home where Judaism was defined and practiced not as a
religion but as a system of ethics and culture. God was present but not
central. My first language was Yiddish, which I still speak with my family.
My home was filled with joy and optimism although punctuated at times by
grief and loss. Israel and the notion of a Jewish homeland were very
important to my parents. After all, the remnants of our family were there.
But unlike many of their friends, my parents were not uncritical of Israel,
insofar as they felt they could be. Obedience to a state was not an ultimate
Jewish value, not for
them, not after the Holocaust. Judaism provided the context for our life and
for values and beliefs that were not dependent upon national boundaries, but
transcended them. For my mother and father, Judaism meant bearing witness,
railing against injustice and foregoing silence. It meant compassion,
tolerance, and rescue. It meant, as Ammiel Alcalay has written, ensuring to
the extent possible that the memories of the past do not become the memories
of the future. These were the ultimate Jewish values. My parents were not
saints; they had their faults and they made mistakes. But they cared
profoundly about issues of justice and fairness, and they cared profoundly
about people--all people, not just their own. The lessons of the Holocaust
were always presented to me as both particular (i.e., Jewish) and universal.
Perhaps most importantly, they were presented as indivisible. To divide them
would diminish the meaning of both. Looking back over my life, I realize
that through their actions and words, my mother and father never tried to
shield me from self-knowledge; instead, they insisted that I confront what I
did not know or understand. Noam Chomsky speaks of the "parameters of
thinkable thought." My mother and father constantly pushed those parameters
as far as they could, which was not far enough for me, but they taught me
how to push them and the importance of doing so.***
It was perhaps inevitable that I would follow a path that would lead me to
the Arab-Israeli issue. I visited Israel many times while growing up. As a
child, I found it a beautiful, romantic, and peaceful place. As a teenager
and young adult I began to feel certain contradictions that I could not
fully explain but which centered on what seemed to be the almost complete
absence in Israeli life and discourse of Jewish life in Eastern Europe
before the Holocaust, and even of the Holocaust itself. I would ask my aunt
why these subjects were not discussed, and why Israelis didn't learn to
speak
Yiddish. My questions were often met with grim silence.
Most painful to me was the denigration of the Holocaust and pre-state Jewish
life by many of my Israeli friends. For them, those were times of shame,
when Jews were weak and passive, inferior and unworthy, deserving not of our
respect but of our disdain. "We will never allow ourselves to be
slaughtered again or go so willingly to our slaughter," they would say.
There was little need to understand those millions who perished or the lives
they lived. There was even less need to honor them. Yet at the same time,
the Holocaust was used by the state as a defense against others, as a
justification for political and military acts.
I could not comprehend nor make sense of what I was hearing. I remember
fearing for my aunt. In my confusion, I also remember profound anger. It was
at that moment, perhaps, that I began thinking about the Palestinians and
their conflict with the Jews. If so many among us could negate our own
and so pervert the truth, why not with the Palestinians? Was there a link of
some sort between the murdered Jews of Europe and the Palestinians? I did
not know, but so my search began.
The journey has been a painful one but among the most meaningful of my life.
At my side, always, was my mother, constant in her support, although
ambivalent and conflicted at times. My father had died a young man; I do not
know what he would have thought, but I have always felt his presence. My
Israeli family opposed what I was doing and has always remained steadfast in
their opposition. In fact, I have not spoken with them about my work in over
fifteen years. ***
Despite many visits to Israel during my youth, I first went to the West Bank
and Gaza in the summer of 1985, two and a half years before the first
Palestinian uprising, to conduct fieldwork for my doctoral dissertation,
which examined American economic assistance to the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
My research focused on whether it was possible to promote economic
development under conditions of military occupation. That summer changed my
life because it was then that I came to understand and experience what
occupation was and what it meant. I learned how occupation works, its impact
on the economy, on daily life, and its grinding impact on people. I learned
what it meant to have little control over one's life and, more importantly,
over the lives of one's children.
As with the Holocaust, I tried to remember my very first encounter with the
occupation. One of my earliest encounters involved a group of Israeli
soldiers, an old Palestinian man, and his donkey. Standing on a street with
some Palestinian friends, I noticed an elderly Palestinian walking down the
street, leading his donkey. A small child no more than three or four years
old, clearly his grandson, was with him. Some Israeli soldiers standing
nearby went up to the old man and stopped him. One soldier ambled over to
the donkey and pried open its mouth. "Old man," he asked, "why are your
donkey's teeth so yellow? Why aren't they white? Don't you brush your donkey
's teeth?" The old Palestinian was mortified, the little boy visibly upset.
The soldier repeated his question, yelling this time, while the other
soldiers laughed. The child began to cry and the old man just stood there
silently,
humiliated. This scene repeated itself while a crowd gathered. The soldier
then ordered the old man to stand behind the donkey and demanded that he
kiss the animal's behind. At first, the old man refused but as the soldier
screamed at him and his grandson became hysterical, he bent down and did it.
The soldiers laughed and walked away. They had achieved their goal: to
humiliate him and those around him. We all stood there in silence, ashamed
to look at each other, hearing nothing but the uncontrollable sobs of the
little boy. The old man did not move for what seemed a very long time. He
just stood there, demeaned and destroyed.
I stood there too, in stunned disbelief. I immediately thought of the
stories my parents had told me of how Jews had been treated by the Nazis in
the 1930s, before the ghettos and death camps, of how Jews would be forced
to clean sidewalks with toothbrushes and have their beards cut off in
public.
What happened to the old man was absolutely equivalent in principle, intent,
and impact: to humiliate and dehumanize. In this instance, there was no
difference between the German soldier and the Israeli one. Throughout that
summer of 1985, I saw similar incidents: young Palestinian men being forced
by Israeli soldiers to bark like dogs on their hands and knees or dance in
the streets.
In this critical respect, my first encounter with the occupation was the
same as my first encounter with the Holocaust, with the number on my
father's arm. It spoke the same message: the denial of one's humanity. It is
important to understand the very real differences in volume, scale, and
horror between
the Holocaust and the occupation and to be careful about comparing the two,
but it is also important to recognize parallels where they do exist.
As a child of Holocaust survivors I always wanted to be able in some way to
experience and feel some aspect of what my parents endured, which, of
course, was impossible. I listened to their stories, always wanting more,
and shared their tears. I often would ask myself, what does sheer terror
feel like? What does it look like? What does it mean to lose ones whole
family so horrifically and so immediately, or to have an entire way of life
extinguished so irrevocably? I would try to imagine myself in their place,
but it was impossible. It was beyond my reach, too unfathomable.
It was not until I lived with Palestinians under occupation that I found at
least part of the answers to some of these questions. I was not searching
for the answers; they were thrust upon me. I learned, for example, what
sheer terror looked like from my friend Rabia, eighteen years old, who,
frozen by fear and uncontrollable shaking, stood glued in the middle of a
room we shared in a refugee camp, unable to move, while Israeli soldiers
were trying to break down the front door to our shelter. I experienced
terror while watching Israeli soldiers beat a pregnant women in her belly
because she flashed a V-sign at them, and I was too paralyzed by fear to
help her. I could more concretely understand the meaning of loss and
displacement when I watched grown men sob and women scream as Israeli army
bulldozers destroyed their home and everything in it because they built
their house without a permit, which the Israeli authorities had refused to
give them.
It is perhaps in the concept of home and shelter that I find the most
profound link between the Jews and the Palestinians, and perhaps, the most
painful illustration of the meaning of occupation. I cannot begin to
describe how horrible and obscene it is to watch the deliberate destruction
of a family's home while that family watches, powerless to stop it. For Jews
as for Palestinians, a house represents far more than a roof over one's
head; it represents life itself. Speaking about the demolition of
Palestinian homes, Meron Benvenisti, an Israeli historian and scholar,
writes:
It would be hard to overstate the symbolic value of a house to an individual
for whom the culture of wandering and of becoming rooted to the land is so
deeply engrained in tradition, for an individual whose national mythos is
based on the tragedy of being uprooted from a stolen homeland. The
arrival of a firstborn son and the building of a home are the central events
in such an individual's life because they symbolize continuity in time and
physical space. And with the demolition of the individual's home comes the
destruction of the world.
Israel's occupation of the Palestinians is the crux of the problem between
the two peoples, and it will remain so until it ends. For the last
thirty-five years, occupation has meant dislocation and dispersion; the
separation of families; the denial of human, civil, legal, political, and
economic rights imposed by a system of military rule; the torture of
thousands; the confiscation of tens of thousands of acres of land and the
uprooting of tens of thousands of trees; the destruction of more than 7,000
Palestinian homes; the building of illegal Israeli settlements on
Palestinian lands and the doubling of the settler population over the last
ten years; first the undermining of the Palestinian economy and now its
destruction; closure; curfew; geographic fragmentation; demographic
isolation; and collective punishment.***
Israel's occupation of the Palestinians is not the moral equivalent of the
Nazi genocide of the Jews. But it does not have to be. No, this is not
genocide, but it is repression, and it is brutal. And it has become
frighteningly natural. Occupation is about the domination and dispossession
of one people by another. It is about the destruction of their property and
the destruction of their soul. Occupation aims, at its core, to deny
Palestinians their humanity by denying them the right to determine their
existence, to live normal lives in their own homes. Occupation is
humiliation. It is despair and desperation. And just as there is no moral
equivalence or symmetry between the Holocaust and the occupation, so there
is no moral equivalence or symmetry between the occupier and the occupied,
no matter how much we as Jews regard ourselves as victims.
And it is from this context of deprivation and suffocation, now largely
forgotten, that the horrific and despicable suicide bombings have emerged
and taken the lives of more innocents. Why should innocent Israelis, among
them my aunt and her grandchildren, pay the price of occupation? Like the
settlements, razed homes, and barricades that preceded them, the suicide
bombers have not always been there.
Memory in Judaism--like all memory--is dynamic, not static, embracing a
multiplicity of voices and shunning the hegemony of one. But in the
post-Holocaust world, Jewish memory has faltered--even failed--in one
critical respect: it has excluded the reality of Palestinian suffering and
Jewish culpability therein. As a people, we have been unable to link the
creation of Israel with the displacement of the Palestinians. We have been
unwilling to see, let alone remember, that finding our place meant the loss
of theirs. Perhaps one reason for the ferocity of the conflict today is that
Palestinians are insisting on their voice despite our continued and
desperate efforts to subdue it.
Within the Jewish community it has always been considered a form of heresy
to compare Israeli actions or policies with those of the Nazis, and
certainly one must be very careful in doing so. But what does it mean when
Israeli soldiers paint identification numbers on Palestinian arms; when
young
Palestinian men and boys of a certain age are told through Israeli
loudspeakers to gather in the town square; when Israeli soldiers openly
admit to shooting Palestinian children for sport; when some of the
Palestinian dead must be buried in mass graves while the bodies of others
are left in city streets and camp alleyways because the army will not allow
proper burial; when certain Israeli officials and Jewish intellectuals
publicly call for the destruction of Palestinian villages in retaliation for
suicide bombings or for the transfer of the Palestinian population out of
the West Bank and Gaza; when 46 percent of the Israeli public favors such
transfers and when transfer or expulsion becomes a legitimate part of
popular discourse; when government officials speak of the "cleansing of the
refugee camps"; and when a leading Israeli intellectual calls for hermetic
separation between Israelis and Palestinians in the form of a Berlin Wall,
caring not whether the Palestinians on the other side of the wall may starve
to death as a result.
What are we supposed to think when we hear this? What is my mother supposed
to think?
In the context of Jewish existence today, what does it mean to preserve the
Jewish character of the State of Israel? Does it mean preserving a Jewish
demographic majority through any means and continued Jewish domination of
the Palestinian people and their land? What is the narrative that we as a
people are creating, and what kind of voice are we seeking? What sort of
meaning do we as Jews derive from the debasement and humiliation of
Palestinians? What is at the center of our moral and ethical discourse? What
is the source of our moral and spiritual legacy? What is the source of our
redemption? Has the process of creating and rebuilding ended for us? I want
to end this essay with a quote from Irena Klepfisz, a writer and child
survivor of the Warsaw ghetto, whose father spirited her and her mother out
of the ghetto and then himself died in the ghetto uprising. I have concluded
that one way to pay tribute to those we loved who struggled, resisted and
died is to hold on to their vision and their fierce outrage at the
destruction of the ordinary life of their people. It is this outrage we need
to keep alive in our daily life and apply it to all situations, whether they
involve Jews or non-Jews. It is
this outrage we must use to fuel our actions and vision whenever we see any
signs of the disruptions of common life: the hysteria of a mother grieving
for the teenager who has been shot; a family stunned in front of a
vandalized or demolished home; a family separated, displaced; arbitrary and
unjust laws
that demand the closing or opening of shops and schools; humiliation of a
people whose culture is alien and deemed inferior; a people left homeless
without citizenship; a people living under military rule. Because of our
experience, we recognize these evils as obstacles to peace. At those moments
of recognition, we remember the past, feel the outrage that inspired the
Jews of the Warsaw Ghetto and allow it to guide us in present struggles. For
me, these words define the true meaning of Judaism and the lessons my
parents sought to impart.